/home/techb158/cosmic-risk.abdallabala.com/docs
NameSizeModeActions
00-design-study.md36780644editdlrm
01-uml-class-diagram.puml118690644editdlrm
02-use-case-diagram.puml37630644editdlrm
03-sequence-diagrams.puml97320644editdlrm
04-database-entity-model.mmd70510644editdlrm
05-database-schema.sql133720644editdlrm
06-diagram-preview.html50210644editdlrm
07-design-checklist.md32560644editdlrm
08-step-2-storage-layer.md53250644editdlrm
09-step-3-risk-crud-ui.md33800644editdlrm
10-step-4-mitigation-workflow.md39960644editdlrm
11-step-5-deployment-gate-workflow.md22920644editdlrm
12-step-6-multi-pm-integration.md37700644editdlrm
13-step-6-1-microsoft-planner-integration.md23350644editdlrm
14-step-7-reporting-export.md41580644editdlrm
15-step-7-1-oauth-live-connectors.md45450644editdlrm
16-step-8-user-roles-access-control.md32970644editdlrm
17-step-9-production-deployment-security.md42280644editdlrm
18-step-10-final-academic-submission.md31990644editdlrm
19-final-report-draft.md68140644editdlrm
20-instructor-submission-checklist.md36390644editdlrm
21-demo-script.md39480644editdlrm
22-traceability-matrix.md48470644editdlrm
23-testing-evidence.md29610644editdlrm
24-evaluation-rubric-mapping.md29100644editdlrm
25-final-deployment-runbook.md32140644editdlrm
26-known-limitations-and-future-work.md26320644editdlrm
27-final-qa-checklist.md28930644editdlrm
28-demo-rehearsal-script.md36180644editdlrm
29-submission-freeze-report.md27690644editdlrm
30-final-known-issues.md18760644editdlrm
31-saas-rebuild-implementation.md25730644editdlrm
application-documentation.md275150644editdlrm
conversation-log.md185030644editdlrm
dashboard-spec.md36910644editdlrm
database-guide.md378260644editdlrm
development-summary.md70700644editdlrm
github-architecture.svg62880644editdlrm
integration-pull-push-plan.md73840644editdlrm
Edit: /home/techb158/cosmic-risk.abdallabala.com/docs/26-known-limitations-and-future-work.md (2632B)
# Known Limitations and Future Work ## 1. Known limitations | Limitation | Explanation | Suggested improvement | |---|---|---| | JSON storage | The prototype stores data in local JSON files | Replace with PostgreSQL, SQLite, or another database | | Basic actor header | User identity is simulated through `X-Cosmic-User-Id` | Add full authentication with sessions or identity provider | | Live connector credentials required | Trello, Jira, Asana, and Microsoft Planner live sync require external app registration | Complete provider-specific production setup | | Scoring calibration | The scoring model is an implementation proposal | Validate weights with industrial case data | | Report PDF generation | Reports are HTML and CSV, not server-generated PDF | Add server-side PDF generation if needed | | No real-time collaboration | Updates require reload or user action | Add WebSocket or server-sent events | | No notification workflow | Users are not notified of gate changes or overdue mitigations | Add email, Slack, Teams, or PM tool notifications | | No advanced analytics | The dashboard focuses on operational risk tracking | Add trend analysis, forecasting, and model drift analytics | ## 2. Future work roadmap ### Phase 1: Production data layer 1. Add PostgreSQL schema. 2. Add migrations. 3. Add database indexes. 4. Add transaction-safe writes. 5. Add database backup and restore automation. ### Phase 2: Authentication 1. Add login. 2. Add secure sessions. 3. Add passwordless or SSO authentication. 4. Bind roles to authenticated users. 5. Add admin password reset workflow. ### Phase 3: Live integrations 1. Complete Trello production sync. 2. Complete Jira Cloud production sync. 3. Complete Asana production sync. 4. Complete Microsoft Planner production sync through Microsoft Graph. 5. Add retry and failure handling. 6. Add conflict resolution for bidirectional updates. ### Phase 4: Advanced governance 1. Add configurable gate policies. 2. Add organization-specific risk thresholds. 3. Add approval chains. 4. Add legal and ethical review templates. 5. Add model monitoring rules. ### Phase 5: Research validation 1. Apply the dashboard to a real AI project case. 2. Compare dashboard risk results to expert assessment. 3. Calibrate indicators and weights. 4. Document measurement validity and uncertainty. 5. Prepare academic publication or technical report. ## 3. Final note The current system is complete enough for academic demonstration and instructor evaluation. It is not a finished enterprise product. Its main value is proving the transformation from framework to software artifact.